Showing posts with label rescue. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rescue. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 01, 2013

Courts to the rescue of missing children


While there are periodic reports in the media about abducted children, there is no systematic approach to the larger issue of missing children in the country. An order of the Allahabad High Court provides hope for ending police apathy and instituting a more co-ordinated approach to the problem. Karuna Dayal reports for Combat Law Magazine.

Link: http://www.combatlaw.org/?p=888


In Malancha Rajbari, a 15 year old girl managed to return after a year in a Delhi brothel……… “Once in Delhi, they put me in a brothel, where I was tortured and sexually abused. It continued for a year before I ran away in the morning”. In Khammam district-Andhra Pradesh, Sujata (name changed) was 10 years when she was sold to a brothel in Mumbai for Rs. 2000… “We used to live with Mrs. Trivedi… she used to take us for picnics with lots of men…we were not given any money…only food and clothes to wear”. She is 15 now and back. An estimated 30,000 girls are trafficked into the sex industry every year. Some are sold by poverty-stricken parents hoping that their children will find employment as domestic servants. Others are simply snatched off the streets, drugged, raped, and sold to brothel “madams.”

Due to the ignorance and apathy on part of the government and the police there has been a steady increase in the number of missing children each year. The shocking and traumatic Nithari killings in Noida underline the growing sense of insecurity and helplessness among the Indian citizens as a result of the lack of accountability in the government, police and other law-enforcement agencies. This lack of accountability is reflected in the inattentive and lax approach of the police when agonised parents come to seek their help. The court recently has brought the issue into the open and has also put the entire scenario of missing children in perspective. When the numbers of missing children provided by various organisations are collated they add up to an unacceptably large number. And it is possible that this is only the tip of the iceberg, since there may well be a large number of unreported cases.

For instance, in Ghaziabad alone, in the last three months 45 children had gone missing, as revealed by a local organisation. In Delhi, NavShrishti, an NGO working on child rights, on filing for an RTI (Right to Information), came to know that there were approximately a hundred children missing in the age group of 3 to 18 years. Countless children go ‘missing’ every year all over the country. These missing children are victims of abductions/kidnappings by family members, abductions/kidnappings carried out by non-family  members or strangers, children who run away on their own or are forced to run away due to compelling  circumstances in their families and extended surroundings, children who face unfriendly and hostile  environment and are asked to leave home or who are abandoned, children who are trafficked or smuggled or exploited for various purposes, and children who are lost or injured. This matter was brought to the notice of the court in Allahabad, when a distressed father took help of the law to find his child. It became evident then that there were more than 7000 children who had been missing for more than two years. Not only the administration and the police but also civil society takes no notice of this issue with the requisite seriousness. It seems that, on account of excess work load or a faulty system or a low sense of accountability or the want of a sound support system of justice and government, they just want to wash their hands off matter rather than making efforts to find ways and means to trace these children.

The police take advantage of the  vulnerability of the average citizen who is not aware of the law and often does not have the financial capacity  to take any required action. The government and the concerned bodies
accept the fact that the number of missing children is, in fact, more than the statistics given in reports from  time to time. It could be quite possible that in some cases the child for various reasons has run away on his or her own from home, a relative’s home, or an institution which the child’s parents/guardians construe as ‘missing’. But the consistent increase in the number of missing children all around the country makes it difficult to judge the gravity of the problem.

However, the guidelines set by the Allahabad High Court for missing children should put an end to the
lethargic attitude to the police and the government. This historic order of the Court came following the inaction of the police and the plea of a retired postal department employee, Vishnu Dayal Sharma, who moved the Allahabad High Court for tracing his 17 year old son Krishna Gopal when he went missing on February 22, 2005. The Court, acting on his plea, sought details from the state government on complaints of missing children of various age groups across the state. The case was heard by a bench, comprising Justice Amar Saran that started on January 2, 2007.

Following the orders of the bench the police lodged a report for Krishna Gopal’s kidnapping on January 5, 2007. Krishna Gopal has now returned home and the case for his kidnapping was closed eventually when a villager recognised him in a train. It was as a result of this case that data regarding missing children came out into the open, something that was otherwise kept under wraps by the police. Between 2000 and April 2008
there were 7,659 cases of missing children lodged in Uttar Pradesh. Of these, 5, 965 children have either been found or have died. It is not clear whether children who have returned home came back on their own or were returned with the help of the police. But, the biggest and most crucial question is, how are the remaining 2000 children still out of the police radar? The guidelines and orders that have proceeded from the
hearings on the missing children case in the Allahabad High Court have made the officials and the governing bodies answerable to the court. The court has asked the central and state governments to work in coordination to solve the problem of children who go missing. As a result of the directions of the high court there has been some visible change in the tracing of missing children, primarily in enabling poor and helpless parents to obtain legal and government access. The court has brought together the ministry of home affairs, ministry of women and child development, ministry of labour, ministry of social welfare, Delhi Government, Delhi Police, National Crime Records Bureau and prominent NGOs both at the Centre and state levels.

As directed by the high court, the police and the judicial system have been evidently showing some results.
The Uttar Pradesh Commissioner of Police has said that the missing children bureau has pasted two kinds of
missing children posters at various places in the state. One of the posters has mentioned the contact numbers
of an authorised body while the other has information for parents of missing children for the safety of the
child. According to the directions of the court, a budget of Rs 12.7 crores for the period of 2007-08 was allocated for taking photographs of school going children from the age group of 6 to 14 years. Till May 2008 the committee had involved the ministry of home affairs, ministry of women and child development, ministry of labour, ministry of social welfare, legal services authority, district magistrate, Allahabad in the mission to
rescue children.

Picture Courtesy: http://www.instablogs.com

Saturday, November 17, 2012

In search of identity.....




This blog is about Dini also known as Daisy, (human traffickers normally change the names of the victims as well as the identity which exists close to nothing), a 15 year old girl from Jharkhand who was trafficked to New Delhi for Domestic work by a Placement Agency on a false promise of working at a missionary institution. 

Incidents of this human trafficking case have been minutely described to share the process of interviews with the trafficked victim, traffickers, rescue planning, coordination and challenges faced while working with the police. 

DAY 1:
The team of rescuers after a bit of research with Dini's fathers help established contacts with Dini's employer. The house where Dini was working as a domestic worker was in Miya Wali Nagar, PaschimVihar, Delhi. 

On asking Mr. B, (Dini's employer) it was realised that she had run away from the house on 17 th of May. The owner claimed to have reported the girl missing to the closest police the day she ran away.

DAY 2:
The rescue team approached a Punjabi Bagh police station, informing them about the Placement agency.

The police staff was initially very apprehensive in sending a constable with the team to the placement agency for the mere reason that there was absolutely no complaint filed with the police in the matter of this case. They were constantly questioning as to how fist there could be a situation where the police hasn’t filed an FIR. They seemed to be quite amazed at the bizarre prospects of a police station not lodging an FIR. They seemed to believe that this case was the “head ache” of the Ranchi Police and that they had no authority to deal with the case. But after a lot of persuasion, they finally agreed to send a constable along and by default sent the head constable along.

On reaching the area, the first impression one gets wouldn’t in any ones wildest dreams suggest that there could have been such an agency being run there. In a crowded street, above a sweet shop after climbing a narrow stairway, we reached the Placement Agency. On entering the room we met Misha the Placement Agency owner. After a short round of questioning the Misha about Dini all the people inside the room were called out.

About 4/5 minor girls walked out from behind the curtains and were asked their names as well as that of their fathers. A lot of the girls were afraid to respond but eventually answered. It was revealed that all the girls were from Jharkhand. There was a boy there who claimed to be the brother of one of the girls but again when questioned was trying to divert it by saying that his sister had already mentioned all the details.The owner as well as the girls claimed that the girls were all going back to the village. But there isn’t any confirmation of that fact.

Since the team was more concerned with rescuing Mr. P's daughter, Dini, they got back t questioning Misha about her. She produced forms in which all the information about he girl was written. It included her name, age, current address and other such information. From the face of it, the agency seemed to be very well organised.

Following the information given in the form, we went to the mentioned address which was a house in Janak Puri, Delhi. Once there the lady, more worried about the consequence she will face, didn’t want to hand over the child or so much so as let us in till it was assured to her that it will be given to her in written that the girl has been handed over and that she was to face no trouble related to this case. She immediately brought out the form in which it read that the girl was 18 yrs of age. Once she realised that it wasn’t her who we wanted to deal with, we were allowed to enter the house and a girl was brought out.

Once the formalities of the written statements and handing over were completed, the girl and the father were both taken back to a safe place.

 DAY 3:

Flashback: 

We visited a Church, where Mr. P and his daughter Dini were residing. We first spoke to Dini as her father was not present at that very moment. The girl was asked few questions to get a clearer picture as to why was to that she actually ran away. She claimed that her friend, Loveleen’s bhabi, Salomi was the one who had informed Misha (the agency owner/human trafficker) about the girls and was told that the two- Dini and Loveleen want to go to Delhi to work. It was Misha who had come to take the girls to Delhi and stayed with the girls at her sister’s house. They reached Delhi on the 12th and by the 13th Dini, from here on was referred to as Daisy, was placed in a house in Miya Wali, Paschim Vihar.

She worked there till the 17th after which she escaped. Her schedule there required her to wake up by 5 am and work till 9 pm. She did mention that she was scolded at times. On the 17th she escaped and walked back to Punjabi Bagh on her own. She didn’t once stop for directions, and had observed the way when she was taken to work and knew it to the T.

Once she reached the Agency she told “Nandu”, Misha’s husband and the co-owner of the agency, that she wanted to go back home but instead he sent her to work in Janak Puri.

Dini's decision to come to Delhi was fueled mainly because she was persuaded by both Misha and Salomi. 

Dini is well versed in English and writes the language beautifully, she was a studying the the 10th grade when trafficked, She is very fond of writing and reading and wants to study further. She is now back in Jharkhand and is happily continuing with her education.

It has to be noted that in this kind of a service sector (placement agencies) there is an immense scope for Human trafficking to thrive. Many of these young girls end up working in forced labour situations where they work without wages and sometimes are also subjected to physical and sexual harassment. Till now, there is no Central Legislation governing the regulation of domestic placement agencies which protects these domestic workers.

Picture Courtesy: Facebook: Anonymous ART of Revolution's photo